System Architecture
The role of the Security Agent Eco-System is: 1) The creation, distribution and management of agents; 2) Secure communication between agents and authorities over a network; 3) The means to tag, certify, revoke and validate of data ownership and integrity of any data or content. A less abstract visual depiction of the Security Agent System architecture is presented below:

In summary, Security Agents and their related Eco-System present the means and mechanisms for creating a new model of enhanced cyber security effectiveness.
A Security Agent System creates Security Agents and secures the network for communication between agents and should at a minimum include the following properties:
- User Centric: The eco-system must serve the data protection needs of the User, for after all, it is their data
- Agreement Based: The use, reuse and sharing of data must be explicitly agreed to between owners of data and any relying party
- Zero Knowledge Verification: The validating system should by design have no knowledge of, or access to, any User or Authentic Attribute Authority data. That is, any actors (claiming and/or relying parties) should be able to both assert and rely upon claims made, without needing access to plain/unencrypted data. This is a much more stringent provision than the often sited, but much weaker ‘principle of least privilege’, whereby plain data is conceptually only shared/exposed on a needs-to-know basis.
- Dynamically Extensible Data Sets: In order to facilitate the confidentiality and integrity of all exchangeable data, the data certificate/certification infrastructure must be capable of dynamically assembling (in real time) data sets of any size.
- Authority Enabled: A systematic means of registering the ownership of data and objects (Registration Authorities) as well as a means of zero knowledge validation (Authentic Attribute authorities).
- Revocation and Validation: Both relying and claiming parties require mechanisms to both validate data as well as assess revocation, either in real time, pseudo real time (i.e. next session) or statically(data that is simply signed) depending on the nature of the data.
- Networkable Public Key Infrastructure: User friendly key management (i.e. operating in the background/not requiring user action), seamlessly networkable to provide an Internet scalable key distribution architecture.
- Secure Agent Production and Distribution: In order for the agency to update its agents in a secure manner, the system must establish attestation mechanisms sufficient to ensure trustworthiness.
- Secure, Application Aware and Diversifiable Network Protocol. The security weaknesses of SSL are well documented and as such a more secure protocol is required for obvious reasons. Furthermore, the creation of a more robust network protocol can strengthen security well beyond simply eradicating SSL deficiencies, such as phishing attacks. For example, by diversifying the network protocol, making it user/SP, or user/SP session specific, users without protocol access rights would not even elicit a server response (i.e. server returns an error) The benefit of this capability would be a much harder to probe/hack server environment. Further, the lack of login and/or other page accessibility to attackers eliminates brute force attacks and adds yet another hurdle for server vulnerability probing, both of which could be utilized to protect for example the servers, or administrative consoles of critical infrastructure servers.
- Internet Scalable Identity Infrastructure. The Internet must evolve its current view of Identity as really nothing more than a system specific unique identifier towards an identity aware, but anonymous as required, infrastructure. In our model this would be accomplished by binding a user’s identity to their agent and through the validation of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) either by an Authentic Attribute Authority such as the passport office or through the use of pseudo Authentic Attribute authorities such as Equifax, Experian, TransUnion etc.
Federate Networks’ system provides foundational technologies to securely connect users, data, content, systems and code “from here to there (network), from now until then (storage), from one to another (runtime) and on this and on that (form factor)”.
While many security companies focus on smaller pieces of a bigger puzzle, Federated Networks believes that cyber-security is all-or-none. In other words “you can’t lock your doors and leave your windows open” and expect to be secure. Recognizing this reality, FN is leading the way by delivering cyber security infrastructure that comprehensively protects against network software security’s most pervasive threat vectors. Take a look at the seamless, end-to-end technology architecture of the FN Connect Securely™ Framework.
- FN Agent
- Meta Certificate Authority Services
- Cloud Connect Security Services
- Authentic Attribute Authority Services
Each of the FN Connect Securely components provides an essential set of services, but each element is ancillary to the effectiveness of the whole. For a cyber security solution to be truly effective, it needs to act as one virtual system with none of the seams that create natural attack vectors for hackers to exploit. Importantly, the systems decision-making and decision-enforcement capabilities must be both unified and agreement enabled. More than the sum of its parts, FN’s “one system, no seams” cyber security software shuts down all paths of least resistance, making it unbeatable and unhackable.